President Trump Offers to Improve Obamacare After Government Reopening

---

Government Standoff Enters Third Week

WASHINGTON – President Donald J. Trump signaled on Friday a willingness to negotiate potential improvements to the Affordable Care Act, commonly known as Obamacare, but only after lawmakers agree to reopen the federal government. The current shutdown—now entering its third week—has paralyzed multiple federal agencies, caused significant economic ripples, and left hundreds of thousands of workers either furloughed or working without pay.

Speaking aboard Air Force One, President Trump said he would consider “making Obamacare better” once Democrats consent to end the shutdown. “I would, I’d be willing to,” he noted. “What they have to do is say yes and then it’s over. And we start. Then go into a negotiation.”

The remarks come amid an intensifying policy standoff over border security, healthcare funding, and federal spending levels. Both Republican and Democratic negotiators have failed to reach a compromise that could restore funding to shuttered agencies while addressing the administration’s broader policy priorities.

---

The Shutdown’s Growing Economic Toll

Federal shutdowns have historically exerted significant drag on the U.S. economy, and this episode appears no different. Analysts estimate that the current lapse in funding could cost the U.S. economy billions of dollars if it continues into November. Unpaid federal workers, delayed procurement contracts, and reduced consumer spending in federal hubs such as Washington, D.C., and Virginia are all compounding the strain.

The 2018–2019 shutdown, which lasted 35 days, serves as a historical reference point. That event temporarily reduced GDP growth by an estimated 0.1% per week, according to the Congressional Budget Office. Economists note that while some of the lost productivity typically rebounds when operations resume, other effects, such as missed loan approvals and tourism losses, tend to create lasting damage.

Small businesses dependent on federal clients are also feeling immediate effects. “The federal market drives our contracts,” said one Virginia-based technology contractor. “Even a two-week delay disrupts payroll. Once we hit a month, we start worrying about keeping our staff.”

---

Trump’s Offer: Revisiting Obamacare

President Trump’s signal of openness to improving Obamacare marks a notable shift in rhetoric. Since his first campaign, Trump has been a leading critic of the Affordable Care Act, frequently describing it as a “disaster” and pledging to replace it. However, his comments aboard Air Force One indicate an interest in reform rather than outright repeal—at least in the short term.

“Look, Obamacare has been terrible,” he said. “We can make it better. I’m all for that. They’re not.” Trump accused congressional Democrats of using the shutdown to push for expanded benefits to undocumented immigrants, saying their proposals would “hurt citizens of this country.”

The President’s remarks underscore a persistent divide over how the nation’s healthcare system should evolve. Democrats have sought to expand Medicaid eligibility, increase subsidies for low-income families, and extend coverage to undocumented residents. The administration, by contrast, has pressed for stricter verification requirements and more limited federal spending.

---

The Affordable Care Act: A Decade of Contention

Since its enactment in 2010, the Affordable Care Act has survived repeated legal and political challenges. It expanded health insurance coverage to over 20 million Americans through Medicaid expansion and government-subsidized marketplaces. However, concerns over rising premiums, limited provider networks, and uneven state participation have dogged the program from its inception.

Republicans have alternated between efforts to repeal, replace, or reform the law. The most significant attempt came in 2017, when a Senate vote narrowly failed to overturn key provisions. That outcome effectively cemented the ACA as a permanent feature of the healthcare landscape but left open the possibility of bipartisan reforms.

Healthcare experts note that while public opinion remains divided, the ACA has become more popular in recent years. A 2025 Gallup poll found that 62% of Americans now hold a favorable view of Obamacare, compared to 50% in 2017. Rising healthcare costs and uncertainty over insurance markets appear to have softened skepticism among moderates and independents.

---

Partisan Divisions Over Healthcare Expansion

At the heart of the current dispute is disagreement over who should receive federal healthcare aid. Democrats in Congress have proposed revisions that would expand eligibility to certain noncitizens and extend Medicare-like programs for low-income residents, citing affordability concerns fueled by pandemic-related inflation.

President Trump has sharply opposed these measures, claiming they would overburden taxpayers and strain public hospitals. “They want to allow many illegal people who came in our country illegally from prisons, from mental institutions, all around the world,” he said. “That will hurt citizens of this country. And I just can’t do it.”

The White House insists that any compromise on healthcare must prioritize U.S. citizens and legal residents while preserving private insurance choice. Democrats, meanwhile, argue that the administration’s position is both fiscally shortsighted and morally untenable. The standoff has deepened as both sides frame the issue around competing visions of fairness and national responsibility.

---

Federal Workers Caught in the Middle

The political gridlock has produced very real consequences for the nation’s 2.1 million federal employees. Paychecks have been frozen for over three weeks, and thousands of workers at agencies ranging from Homeland Security to the National Parks Service have been furloughed. Many are turning to personal savings, community aid programs, and short-term loans to cover essential expenses.

Union representatives have criticized both the White House and Congress for using government workers as bargaining chips. “Every day the shutdown continues, families go deeper into debt,” said Daniel Fields, president of a major federal employees union. “These are not political pawns—they’re public servants.”

Airports have reported increased delays as Transportation Security Administration employees call in sick, and the Internal Revenue Service has suspended several taxpayer assistance programs. The longer the shutdown persists, experts say, the greater the risk of operational degradation that will take months to reverse.

---

Historical Context: Shutdowns as Political Weapons

Government shutdowns are not new tools in political battles. Since the Budget Act of 1974 formalized the modern appropriations process, the U.S. has experienced more than 20 partial shutdowns. The longest was the 35-day standoff from December 2018 to January 2019—also under President Trump—triggered by disputes over funding for a southern border wall.

However, analysts note that repeated shutdowns erode public confidence and impose hidden costs on the federal workforce. According to the Office of Management and Budget, the 2019 shutdown alone cost taxpayers approximately $3 billion in permanently lost economic activity.

In the current crisis, the stalemate has already forced state governments to allocate emergency funds to keep certain joint federal-state programs running. Food assistance programs and medical reimbursements have begun experiencing processing delays, especially in states heavily reliant on federal funding such as New Mexico and West Virginia.

---

Regional Impact and Public Response

The effects of the shutdown vary widely across regions. In states with high concentrations of federal workers—such as Maryland, Virginia, and Colorado—local economies are feeling a sharp contraction. Restaurants and retail businesses near federal complexes have seen significant drops in revenue.

In contrast, states less dependent on federal salaries, such as Texas or Florida, have experienced fewer immediate effects but remain vulnerable to longer-term economic drag if the situation persists. Tourism-dependent national parks and museums, however, are closed nationwide, creating ripple effects in small communities that rely on seasonal visitors.

Public sentiment reflects a combination of frustration and fatigue. Polls conducted this week show that a majority of Americans want an immediate reopening of the government even if negotiations remain unresolved. However, opinions differ sharply along partisan lines regarding who deserves the most blame for the impasse.

---

The Road Ahead: Reopening Before Reform

Despite the growing economic pressure, prospects for a quick resolution remain uncertain. President Trump’s statement suggests limited flexibility until federal operations resume. Administration officials have indicated that a reopening would unlock broader policy talks on healthcare, immigration, and spending priorities.

For now, both chambers of Congress remain at a standstill. Lawmakers are expected to reconvene in Washington early next week to review emergency proposals to fund the government temporarily. If no agreement is reached by the end of October, it would mark one of the longest funding gaps in modern U.S. history.

President Trump appears intent on using the reopening debate to frame healthcare reform as his next major legislative target. Whether that effort results in substantive policy changes—or simply another round of gridlock—depends on how quickly both sides can restore the government’s basic functions.

As one senior White House aide put it, “We can talk about healthcare when the lights are back on.”