School Teacher at Anti-ICE Protest Warns Federal Agents: ‘Not the Only Ones with Guns’

---

Rising Tensions in South Central Los Angeles Amid Anti-ICE Protest

LOS ANGELES – A protest against U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) took a volatile turn in South Central Los Angeles this week, when a local school teacher warned federal agents that they were "not the only ones with guns" in the community. The remarks, captured on multiple cell phone videos, quickly spread online, drawing both anger and praise as the nation continues to wrestle with questions surrounding immigration enforcement, community safety, and freedom of expression.

The demonstration, held near a cluster of storefronts on Vermont Avenue, began peacefully with chants denouncing federal immigration raids alleged to have taken place in the area earlier this month. Protesters carried signs calling for the abolition of ICE and for local authorities to resist cooperation with federal agents. As the crowd grew, eyewitnesses estimate between 200 and 300 people gathered, many wearing face coverings or holding banners condemning what they described as militarized policing in immigrant communities.

During a fiery speech delivered through a handheld microphone, a man identified by protesters as a local public school teacher addressed the crowd with unwavering intensity. “Don’t forget where you’re standing,” he said. “This is South Central Los Angeles. They are not the only ones with guns in this city.” He continued, “People have every right to defend themselves against mass unidentified gunmen with AR-15s and other rifles. The people have every right to defend themselves.”

The statement ignited immediate reaction—cheers from some demonstrators, but also visible discomfort from others wary of escalating rhetoric.

---

Community Reaction and Police Response

By evening, video of the teacher’s remarks had gone viral, drawing millions of views and sparking a debate across social media platforms. Many users condemned the language as reckless and dangerous, while others defended it as a declaration of constitutional rights amid fears of government overreach.

Los Angeles Police Department officials said they were aware of the event and were reviewing the footage. “Our primary concern is maintaining public safety and protecting the right to peaceful assembly,” a department spokesperson said. “We do not condone threats or incitement to violence from any side.” LAPD presence remained minimal at the demonstration, with officers monitoring the gathering from a distance to avoid confrontation.

ICE representatives declined to comment directly on the incident, referring inquiries to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). A DHS official, speaking on background, stated that federal agents operate “in accordance with U.S. law” and “take officer safety and community protection seriously.”

---

Historical Context: Policing and Protest in South Central

South Central Los Angeles has long stood as a focal point for protest and resistance, particularly against perceived injustice and heavy-handed law enforcement tactics. From the 1965 Watts uprising to the 1992 Los Angeles riots, the area’s history is steeped in movements demanding accountability from police and systemic reform in government institutions.

During the last decade, protests in South Central have increasingly merged social justice issues—police reform, housing inequities, and immigration rights—into a single message of community defense. For many residents, ICE operations represent not only immigration enforcement but also another layer of policing in neighborhoods already coping with economic marginalization and strained trust in institutions.

This protest, unlike earlier demonstrations focused solely on deportation raids, reflected a broader sense of defiance against armed authority. Activists present at the scene distributed pamphlets calling for the city to declare itself a “true sanctuary” where ICE agents would be denied cooperation or access to local records. Others urged reform in how federal law enforcement coordinates with local police forces, asserting that the overlap creates fear rather than safety in immigrant-heavy neighborhoods.

---

The Economic and Social Ripples

The rhetoric emerging from protests like this one carries more than symbolic weight. Local business owners expressed concern that heightened tension could drive customers away or lead to property damage. “We support peaceful protests, but people are scared,” said Mario Pineda, who operates a small grocery store near the protest site. “When the news says someone told the police they’re not the only ones with guns, that means trouble is close.”

Economists who follow urban development trends in Los Angeles note that recurring unrest can slow recovery in lower-income districts. South Central has made economic strides in the past decade, with new housing projects, small business incubators, and education initiatives aimed at young professionals. However, volatility linked to law enforcement incidents has the potential to unsettle investors and alter perceptions of safety.

“Each flare-up reinforces a narrative of instability,” said Dr. Alicia Moreno, an urban policy analyst at a Los Angeles research institute. “While the message from protesters focuses on justice, the byproduct—if not managed carefully—can be a chilling effect on local commerce and housing development.”

---

Broader Immigration Debate Rekindled

The controversy arrives amid renewed scrutiny of immigration enforcement policies nationwide. President Donald Trump’s administration, reinstated in January 2025, has placed renewed emphasis on interior enforcement and partnerships between ICE and local agencies. Although Los Angeles remains a self-declared sanctuary city, advocacy groups claim that enforcement operations have intensified since summer.

According to human rights organizations operating in Southern California, several recent arrests in the region involved undocumented residents with no criminal record, which advocates say contradicts stated federal enforcement priorities. Federal officials maintain that operations target individuals who pose security risks, but the lack of transparency continues to fuel suspicion.

Against this backdrop, the teacher’s words struck chords of both fear and empowerment. Supporters argue his statement reflects legitimate community frustration after decades of aggressive policing. Critics, including some within the city’s education circles, argue that public employees—particularly teachers—have a responsibility to use measured language in public forums. The Los Angeles Unified School District confirmed it was aware of the incident and “reviewing the matter internally.”

---

Comparisons With Other Regional Movements

Los Angeles is not alone in facing confrontations between community activists and federal immigration enforcement. In recent years, cities such as Phoenix, Chicago, and Portland have seen similarly charged protests, often involving educators, clergy, or local officials seeking to draw attention to immigrant rights.

In 2020, educators in Chicago marched in solidarity with undocumented students following ICE arrests near schools, though no violent rhetoric was reported. In Portland, clashes between protesters and federal officers during immigration-related events led to property damage and, in some instances, physical altercations with law enforcement. The rhetoric heard in Los Angeles this week fits within this continuum of opposition but has raised alarms because of its explicit reference to firearms and self-defense.

Sociologists studying civic movements note that language emphasizing defense is often a response to perceived power imbalances. “When communities feel powerless, speech that borders on militancy can gain traction,” explained Dr. Raymond Holt, a political sociologist at UCLA. “While it may not literally call for violence, it signals desperation—a demand to be heard by any means.”

---

Public Debate and Free Speech Questions

The viral nature of the teacher’s remarks has reignited the perennial debate over free speech limits during civic protest. Legal experts point out that expressions of resistance, even using strong language, fall under First Amendment protections unless they amount to direct incitement. “The line between protected speech and criminal threat is narrow but clear in law,” said associate attorney Jennifer Kim, who specializes in civil liberties cases. “So far, based on transcripts circulating, it reads as a warning rather than an instruction to commit violence.”

Nevertheless, critics argue that such rhetoric from an educator could legitimize hostility toward law enforcement and fuel misunderstanding among students. Advocacy groups on both sides have begun mobilizing—immigrant rights organizations calling for support of the teacher and his right to speak, while law enforcement associations push for disciplinary review and training policies to prevent similar incidents.

The Los Angeles City Council has called for a special session to discuss public safety coordination during protests, with several members emphasizing the need for balance between security and constitutional freedoms. Public hearings are expected in the coming weeks.

---

Looking Ahead: Fear, Frustration, and Accountability

As South Central Los Angeles returns to a tentative calm, questions linger about how rhetoric from community activists—especially those in positions of public trust—should be handled in a city already sensitive to issues of race, class, and policing. The teacher at the center of the controversy has not spoken publicly since the video surfaced, though colleagues describe him as “deeply committed to social justice” and “genuinely worried about students who live in fear.”

For residents of South Central, the protest was another chapter in a long story of confrontation and resilience. Some hope it will prompt deeper dialogue about the rules governing federal enforcement in urban communities. Others fear that the confrontation will only harden divisions between activists, law enforcement, and local leaders struggling to maintain peace.

As the city awaits further developments, one thing is clear—the tension between community voices and federal presence continues to define the intersection of immigration policy and civil rights in modern America. The echoes from that South Central street, sharp and defiant, will likely resonate far beyond the boundaries of Los Angeles.